George O. Wood
Readers of my blog will remember that George O. Wood, General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God pressured the Society for Pentecostal Studies to disinvite me from their March, 2010 meeting in Minneapolis. They didn’t cow.
Well, it seems that Wood recently signed the Covenant for Civility: Come Let Us Reason Together, a statement initiated by Sojourners in the wake of Glen Beck’s ranting about “hammering” Jim Wallis. But now Wood has recanted, and is asking that his name be removed from the statement.
It seems, according to a statement of an Assemblies of God spokesperson, that when Wood signed the statement at a recent meeting of the National Association of Evangelicals, he thought that the phrase, “the unity we have in the body of Christ” referred exclusively to evangelicals. When he found out that “the body of Christ” also includes “people who are supportive of gay marriage and abortion rights,” well, that was just too large of a tent for him.
Jill Carroll of the Houston Chronicle rhetorially asks Wood,
I’m not sure why civility should be such a problem, even with people with whom we vehemently disagree on matters of faith. Even if some who call themselves Christians – or “claim the name of Christ” as the statement says – don’t qualify as “Christian” by our standards, shouldn’t we still be civil with them and when we speak about them?
Are we only to be civil toward those who think exactly like us?
But here’s what I find especially ironic. At SPS, the way that North Central College and the others who opposed my appearance protested my presence (they referred to it as a “silent protest”) was to have a computer terminal at the registration table at which people could sign the Manhattan Declaration. And after my address, the Manhattan Declaration came up as part of the Question and Response, including one audience member delivering a homily-styled-as-a-question about his support for the three elements of the Declaration: opposition to abortion; opposition to same sex marriage; and support of religious liberty.
I responded by saying that I have come to find the signing of declarations and statements to be redonkulous (that’s not a direct quote). While I hope I would have had the courage to sign the Barmen Declaration, I don’t believe there’s been a statement since (not even the Lausanne Covenant, my missional friends! 
that is any more powerful than the gospel itself. Plus, as Wood found, these signatures can at times get us in hot water.
So count me as a participant of the covenant we call the Gospel of Jesus Christ. That’s a good enough statement for me.
Related posts:
{ 54 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
“So count me as a participant of the covenant we call the Gospel of Jesus Christ. That’s a good enough statement for me.” -last statement of post.
I’m coming into this a little late so forgive me for derailing the discussion train. I check Google Reader far to infrequently.
Tony, you said the Gospel of Jesus was a statement you could participate in. So I am wondering what is the Gospel of Jesus? Do we have a simple few sentences that sum up that good news? Jesus gives a lot of examples of what it is like but never spells it out. The closest thing we have as a description of the Gospel is from Paul in 1 Corinthians 15, right?
Anyone have a succinct statement of the Gospel of Jesus?
Dave, I like Tom Wright’s summary of the gospel:
“The gospel is the royal announcement that the crucified and risen Jesus, who died for our sins and rose again according to the Scriptures, has been enthroned as the true Lord of the world. When this gospel is preached, God calls people to salvation, out of sheer grace, leading them to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as the risen Lord.”
In case I misunderstood you and you were looking for an eqivalent out of Jesus’ own mouth to the beginning of 1 Corinthians 15, I guess the closest to that kind of summary statement would be Luke 4:18f,21.
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor . . . Today this Scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.”
I used to think the lack of reconciliation amongst Christians was unfortunate, but perhaps each group and denomination considers themselves the only Christians so they are sufficiently reconciled. It’s only discouraging if you happen to grant the authenticity of the faith of those outside your group I guess.
← Previous Comments